Municipal Picture Gallery / Museum Kiscell
Templespace
June 29–August 13 2000
Curated by : Peter Fitz, Krisztina Jerger
János Frank
Chimera, or „bucolic geometry”
When reviewing about 25 years of Tibor Helényi’s oeuvre as an
exhibiting artist, I tend to regard it as one single stream, even though
each of his cycles is different from the rest. Each of his exhibitions
is made up of visual brain twisters and their solutions. Each of his exhibitions,
nay, each of his paintings could have the subtitle, „quod erat demonstrandum”
— that is, „the statement has proved correct”. Helényi is a poeta
doctus, a learned poet, a learned artist. Among the components of his art,
this feature seems to be instinctive, a kind of sidekick. He gave collective titles to each of his exhibitions: Barbarian Geometry,
Bodimage, Pending Pictures, Chimera, Daedalus—Icarus, and now Chimera again.
(I do not include the respective dates of these exhibitions here, they
can be looked up in this catalogue.)
For Helényi, the titles of pictures and exhibitions are almost
of equal importance to the composition and the act of painting itself.
All of his paintings are figurative, he only paints men and horses, or
groups of these. His basic characteristic is a masterly ability of drawing,
the strictness of composition, and a superior knowledge of various materials.
His trade mark is the technique of omission. In his view, the raw canvas,
so close to the organic world, is something for display, rather than to
be covered up.
As the creator of applied art, he has designed an unusually hard and
not very prolific method for designing his posters, magazine and
book covers. He starts out with painting the picture with the traditional
methods, using canvas, oil, and the tip of the brush, and then he makes
a colour transparency reproduction of the finished image. This transparency
is used in print for poster production. In this genre, his poster for the
Paul Klee exhibition in Budapest is a significant achievement in art history. As stated above, the most important features of this artist are the
amazing drawing skills and the jugglery of perspective. His lines and tones
are reminiscent of renaissance art, and the art of mannerism, flourishing
between the age of renaissance and baroque. Very probably, since Bertalan
Székely in the late 19th century, no one has been exploring the
anatomy and choreography of the horse as thoroughly as Helényi does.
The catalogue of his exhibition Barbarian Geometry is a mock-comic book
comprising scenes of warriors and horses, complete with calligraphic writing
which only imitates writing, no one can read it. Helényi is not
only the master of neo-mannerism, and post-pop-art, but also the master
of neo-dadaism. His attitude can be called the creation of a private mythology;
although, to the best of my knowledge, he has never fought on horseback,
nor with a lance to date.
His Bodimage pictures represent a kind of human geometry, the name
is coined up from the words „body” and „image”. He may have turned towards
the archaic because these paintings — lovingly and hatingly — conjure up
the spirit of the 19th century Munich Academy of Art. This collection has
a consistent iconography: it all about the human body, more specifically,
the male nude. Each of the pictures has a static character, the individual
figures all adopt a frontal posture, with the exception of those who turn
their backs to the viewer. Bodimage is of a dualistic character: these
paintings represent the surface, the outward appearance of the human body,
and at the same time, using I and X shaped auxiliary lines, they display
the structural canon, the geometric regularity of the human figure. Next, the artist has consciously waived the organised nature of the
Bodimage paintings, and created his next, possibly greatest exhibition,
Pending Pictures. The subject matter of these suspended paintings has not
changed, it is all about living creatures: men and horses, or the two together.
The static period has come to an end. Helényi’s art has always been
rich in colour, but these paintings display colours in their purity, unmixed.
The warm and cold hues are displayed clashing in a battle of brush strokes.
This period can be characterised as intense, loud, dynamic, or even rustic.
Precision of structure is there, but it is hidden beneath the surface —
as the artist’s latest trick.
The basic principle of Chimera is compilation. Helényi now represents
eclecticism within every single picture, and as a denomination, he borrowed
the term, the name of a monster with a lion’s head, a goat’s body and a
serpent’s tail, from ancient Greek mythology. The smoothness of painting,
reminiscent of 19th century „Biedermeier” art, mingles with rustic and
rough expressionism, and the third main element is the raw surface of the
canvas.
Seeing the title of the next exhibition, Daedalus—Icarus, one might
assume that the subject matter is universal mythology again. The only painting
displayed on this exhibition was fastened to the ceiling, above the barren
walls. The composition represented the two characters, Daedalus and Icarus,
father and son, as one single figure. The artist has used a technique of
extremely thick underpainting with plastic materials, to achieve an almost
3-dimensional effect. The viewer, when entering the hall, first interpreted
the painting as the image of the soaring father, Daedalus. While leaving
the hall, the same painting represented the tragic fall of his son Icarus.
The exhibition at Kiscelli Museum in the year 2000 has the title Chimera
again, because the artist regards this as a direct sequel to his 1992 collection
of the same name. The subject matter is, as it has been for a long time,
the horse and its rider. When asked why he is preoccupied with horses,
his reply was characteristically structural: the human figure is but a
vertical line, while the horseman represents a rectangle.
For these pictures, he used his traditional working method, by painting
a small scale model — not just a sketch — of the picture, and then paints
it again in the accurate dimensions. In this case, some of his paintings
are enlarged to 9 square meters, maybe because he wanted them to look more
impressive in the chiaroscuro church vault environment of the Kiscelli
Museum.
As a matter of fact, paraphrasing the title of Barbarian Geometry,
I would call this collection „bucolic geometry”, even though no lambs or
shepherds are shown to give an Arcadian impression. Geometry is not the
main line of Helényi, he is far from being a constructivist, but
his excellence of composition derives from his affinity to geometric shapes.
His large paintings are divided into smaller segments (for practical,
transportation reasons to start with), and he reassembles them with barely
perceptible, almost non-existent gaps.
Twenty years ago, a divided picture of the Bodimage collection represented
a male nude with a wide hiatus, the bare wall at the waist. As it happened,
I sent this painting „painting in two parts” to the Biennale of Belgrade.
I was delayed by bureaucracy, so I arrived a little too late, just to realise
that the two paintings were hung like two black or two white squares on
a chess board, with their corners touching. The director of the Museum
of Modern Arts in Belgrade had performed a trick different from Helényi’s
intention: the technique of omission now involved omission of the artist
himself... Needless to say, I had the two pictures rearranged as they were
meant to be hung, one above the other. This story shows that the artist
had already started to paint „one” picture on two pieces of canvas.
Later, evolving from his hyper-realistic, expressionistic horses-and-horsemen
compositions, he created his own characteristic „Helényi’s analytic
cubism” which has — luckily — nothing to do with textbook cubism.
„Bigwhite” represents a rocking horse, but the horse’s head and neck,
and the harness gear are the exact portrayal of a real, living horse; the
rest of the image is expressive, complete with lively planes in the background.
A disproportionally small girl is riding on the back of the horse, with
a happy expression on her face. The horse is shown in an enormous size,
as in a child’s imagination.
„A white cross within a blue wedge” is a diagonally oriented, split
composition. It is an extremely foreshortened depiction of a horseman,
made up of passionate and expressive patches, with a slanted cross on the
horse’s head, against the background of a blue triangle, reminiscent of
a rock.
„Lack of the Great Warrior” is also made up of several segments. The
horse’s head is the only detail which can be logically explained, the rest
is but turbulent planar painting over several stretches of canvas, arranged
in displacement, so that the gaps between the individual pieces represent
the inverted figure of the horseman.
Helényi’s rightful and captivating heritage is portrayed in
the picture called „The ‘Der Blaue Reiter’”. The name comes from a group
of artists of many nationalities and various styles, but all living in
Germany before World War I. Franz Marc, one of the founders phrased their
objective: „creating a tradition is braver than exploiting it”. Well, here
we are — Tibor Helényi has revived this tradition on this picture,
in the year 2000. The head and neck of the horse is seen from semi-profile,
combined with vibrantly painted blue squares. After the blue horse, a brown
one comes next, „Hiding Horseman”. The horseman is unseen, and the body
and legs of the animal are also missing from this triangular portrait of
a horse.
„Sunshine, moon shadow” looks like an open book or like the inner pages
of an open invitation card, with a bright and a dark page. In the middle,
like on the back of a book, a narrow rectangle is seen at top, with an
en face portrait of a horse.
These eleven pictures of this church vault exhibition (with paintings
of such large dimensions, eleven pieces are ample) are unyieldingly about
one and the same subject: the horse and the horseman. And yet, each of
them are different from all the others, each disproving and contradicting
the next. The collection presents eleven surprising solutions to one single
theorem.